Loma Linda University’s commitment to Christ-centered, whole-person education is embodied in its seven core values:
Compassion, Excellence, Humility, Integrity, Justice, Teamwork, and Wholeness.

These values serve as the foundation for student learning, professional formation, and personal growth. Each academic program incorporates LLU’s values into its curriculum and assessment practices in ways that are meaningful and appropriate to the discipline and degree level. The Office of Educational Effectiveness partners with programs to support this integration and to ensure values-aligned assessment across the university.

Below are examples on how programs could align LLU values in their programs.

Compassion

“Reflects the love of God with respect, mercy, and empathy.”

  1. Service-Learning Reflection:
    Participate in a community outreach or service event. Submit a reflection paper linking your experience to the value of compassion and identifying what you learned about yourself and others.
  2. Empathy Roleplay:
    Engage in a scenario-based roleplay involving patient/client care. Reflect on how empathy guided your communication and decision-making.
  3. Patient Narrative Assignment:
    Read or listen to a real-life patient story. Write a response explaining how compassion can be applied in similar cases, referencing LLU’s behavioral attributes.

Excellence

“Exceeds expectations with effectiveness, reliability, and efficiency.”

  1. Benchmarking Presentation:
    Research best practices in your field and present a plan for how your unit or department can achieve similar standards of excellence.
  2. Self-Assessment Rubric:
    Use a rubric aligned with LLU’s definition of excellence to evaluate one of your own projects or papers. Write a short improvement plan.
  3. Professional Standards Comparison:
    Choose a published code of excellence in your field and compare it to LLU’s description. Submit a brief written analysis discussing alignments and gaps.

Humility

“Puts self-importance aside for the greater good of others.”

  1. Reflective Journal:
    Write about a time when you listened or collaborated without needing recognition. What did humility look like, and what was the result?
  2. Conflict Resolution Analysis:
    Analyze a conflict (real or hypothetical) and describe how humility could help resolve it. Propose specific language or behaviors that support humble collaboration.
  3. Peer Feedback Exercise:
    Exchange assignments with a peer and provide constructive feedback. Then reflect on how you received and incorporated your peer’s suggestions.

Integrity

“Carries out actions with honesty and trustworthiness.”

  1. Case Study Analysis:
    Analyze a professional ethics case and evaluate the outcomes based on integrity. Explain how alternative decisions might have better aligned with LLU’s values.
  2. Code of Conduct Quiz & Reflection:
    Take a quiz based on your program’s or profession’s code of conduct, then write a reflection on how it supports personal and institutional integrity.
  3. Integrity in Action Log:
    Over one week, record examples where you made (or observed) value-based decisions, including any challenges. Summarize what these moments taught you about integrity.

Justice

“Commits to fostering a welcoming environment.”

  1. Equity Audit Report:
    Conduct a mini “justice audit” of a space, process, or policy in your field. Identify how it supports or hinders justice, and make recommendations for improvement.
  2. Diversity Case Discussion:
    Analyze a real case where inequity or bias occurred in health care or education. Discuss how justice could have been promoted through specific actions or policies.
  3. Advocacy Brief:
    Write a short persuasive brief advocating for a policy change or initiative that promotes justice for an underserved or marginalized group.

Teamwork

“Collaborates to achieve a shared purpose.”

  1. Team Project with Peer Evaluation:
    Complete a team assignment and submit a peer evaluation. Include a reflection on how team members demonstrated LLU’s teamwork behaviors.
  2. Strengths Mapping Activity:
    Map the strengths of your group members using a shared inventory (e.g., CliftonStrengths). Discuss how understanding each other’s skills improves collaboration.
  3. Teamwork Communication Scenario:
    Participate in or analyze a simulated team meeting. Identify positive and negative communication practices, and propose improvements based on LLU’s values.

Wholeness

“Loved by God, growing in health, living with purpose in community.”

  1. Wholeness Wheel Reflection:
    Use a spiritual/mental/physical/emotional wholeness wheel to self-assess and reflect on areas of balance or imbalance in your life. Propose goals for improvement.
  2. Lifestyle & Purpose Essay:
    Write a short essay on how your faith, lifestyle choices, and sense of community support your professional purpose. Include specific habits or commitments.
  3. Guided Group Discussion:
    Participate in a facilitated dialogue on the meaning of wholeness in your field. Submit a reflection connecting discussion points to your own life or learning.

Sample Loma Linda University Values-Based Assessments: Rubrics and Suggested Readings

Compassion

A. Service-Learning Reflection
Rubric:

  • Depth of reflection on compassion (30%)
  • Connection to LLU core value language (20%)
  • Specific examples from service experience (20%)
  • Writing clarity and grammar (15%)
  • Personal growth/insight (15%)

Suggested Reading:

  • Nouwen, H. J. M. (2006). The Wounded Healer: Ministry in Contemporary Society.

B. Empathy Roleplay
Rubric:

  • Demonstrated empathetic communication (30%)
  • Alignment with LLU compassion behaviors (25%)
  • Post-roleplay reflection clarity (20%)
  • Peer/mentor feedback incorporation (15%)
  • Professional tone and conduct (10%)

C. Patient Narrative Assignment
Rubric:

  • Understanding of patient perspective (25%)
  • Analysis of compassionate responses (25%)
  • Use of LLU compassion definition (20%)
  • Writing structure and clarity (20%)
  • Integration of reading or case materials (10%)

Excellence

A. Benchmarking Presentation
Rubric:

  • Clear benchmarking criteria (30%)
  • Application to own context (25%)
  • Visual and verbal clarity (20%)
  • Team contributions (if applicable) (15%)
  • References/citations (10%)

Suggested Reading:

  • Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap... and Others Don’t.

B. Self-Assessment Rubric
Rubric:

  • Honest self-assessment (30%)
  • Use of measurable criteria (25%)
  • Improvement plan alignment with excellence (20%)
  • Depth of insight (15%)
  • Presentation/writing quality (10%)

C. Professional Standards Comparison
Rubric:

  • Clarity in comparison (25%)
  • Integration of field-specific standards (25%)
  • Critical analysis of LLU values (20%)
  • Use of citations (15%)
  • Writing clarity and flow (15%)

Humility

A. Reflective Journal
Rubric:

  • Self-awareness and insight (30%)
  • Connection to LLU humility behaviors (25%)
  • Specific personal examples (20%)
  • Consistency and depth of entries (15%)
  • Grammar and organization (10%)

Suggested Reading:

  • Brooks, D. (2015). The Road to Character.

B. Conflict Resolution Analysis
Rubric:

  • Analysis of conflict elements (25%)
  • Application of humility concepts (25%)
  • Practical resolution strategies (20%)
  • Use of readings or class content (15%)
  • Writing quality (15%)

C. Peer Feedback Exercise
Rubric:

  • Thoughtfulness of feedback given (30%)
  • Integration of peer feedback into revision (30%)
  • Reflection on giving/receiving feedback (20%)
  • Clarity of final product (10%)
  • Professional tone (10%)

Integrity

A. Case Study Analysis
Rubric:

  • Clear summary of case (20%)
  • Evaluation using integrity standards (30%)
  • Alternative actions proposed (20%)
  • Reference to LLU values (15%)
  • Writing and analysis (15%)

Suggested Reading:

  • Kidder, R. M. (2009). How Good People Make Tough Choices.

B. Code of Conduct Quiz & Reflection
Rubric:

  • Quiz performance (20%)
  • Depth of reflection (30%)
  • Specific ethical examples (20%)
  • Connection to LLU integrity statements (15%)
  • Presentation or writing (15%)

C. Integrity in Action Log
Rubric:

  • Number and depth of entries (30%)
  • Alignment with LLU behaviors (25%)
  • Thoughtful analysis of challenges (20%)
  • Clarity and structure (15%)
  • Consistency in logging (10%)

Justice

A. Equity Audit Report
Rubric:

  • Clear scope and focus (25%)
  • Identification of systemic issues (25%)
  • Actionable recommendations (25%)
  • Connection to LLU’s justice value (15%)
  • Writing and formatting (10%)

Suggested Reading:

  • Kendi, I. X. (2019). How to Be an Antiracist.

B. Diversity Case Discussion
Rubric:

  • Depth of analysis (30%)
  • Use of evidence/cases (25%)
  • Group discussion participation (20%)
  • Written reflection quality (15%)
  • Clarity of argument (10%)

C. Advocacy Brief
Rubric:

  • Persuasive and clear argument (30%)
  • Evidence and data use (25%)
  • Relevance to justice (20%)
  • Writing organization (15%)
  • Use of sources (10%)

Teamwork

A. Team Project + Peer Evaluation
Rubric:

  • Contribution to group outcome (30%)
  • Collaboration and communication (25%)
  • Peer feedback scores (20%)
  • Product quality (15%)
  • Reflection on teamwork (10%)

Suggested Reading:

  • Lencioni, P. (2002). The Five Dysfunctions of a Team.

B. Strengths Mapping Activity
Rubric:

  • Participation in mapping (25%)
  • Accuracy and insight (25%)
  • Reflection on team dynamics (20%)
  • Application to team project (20%)
  • Presentation clarity (10%)

C. Teamwork Communication Scenario
Rubric:

  • Identification of communication styles (25%)
  • Application of teamwork behaviors (25%)
  • Group participation (20%)
  • Clarity and organization (20%)
  • Reflection quality (10%)

Wholeness

A. Wholeness Wheel Reflection
Rubric:

  • Completion of wheel and categories (25%)
  • Reflection on spiritual/physical/emotional health (25%)
  • Specific goals and plans (20%)
  • Depth of insight (20%)
  • Writing clarity (10%)

Suggested Reading:

  • White, E. G. (1890). Steps to Christ.

B. Lifestyle & Purpose Essay
Rubric:

  • Clear articulation of purpose (25%)
  • Connection to lifestyle choices (25%)
  • Use of spiritual or community lens (20%)
  • Personal insight (20%)
  • Grammar and structure (10%)

C. Guided Group Discussion
Rubric:

  • Active participation (25%)
  • Respectful and thoughtful comments (25%)
  • Connection to wholeness concept (20%)
  • Use of examples or experiences (15%)
  • Post-discussion reflection (15%)